Menu_Home Home   Menu_Latest Latest   Menu_Search Advanced Search   Menu_Browse_by_Year By Year   Menu_Browse_by_Division By Division
Screen decoration graphicsLogo

On Qualitative Probabilities for Legal Reasoning about Evidence

Keppens, J. (2007) On Qualitative Probabilities for Legal Reasoning about Evidence. In: In Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Aberystwyth, Wales.

Full text not available from this repository.


A crucial aspect of evidential reasoning in crime investigation involves comparing the support that evidence provides for alternative hypotheses. Recent work in forensic statistics has shown how Bayesian Networks (BNs) can be employed for this purpose. However, the specification of BNs requires conditional probability tables describing the uncertain processes under evaluation. When these processes are poorly understood, it is necessary to rely on subjective probabilities provided by experts. Accurate probabilities of this type are normally hard to acquire from experts. Recent work in qualitative reasoning has developed methods to perform probabilistic reasoning using coarser representations. However, the latter types of approaches are too imprecise to compare the likelihood of alternative hypotheses. This paper examines this shortcoming of the qualitative approaches when applied to the aforementioned problem, and identifies and integrates techniques to refine them.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
ID Code:270
Deposited By:Dr Jeroen Keppens
Deposited On:08 Nov 2007 14:58
Last Modified:18 Apr 2009 19:52

Repository Staff Only: item control page